CMI Video
CMI Video
  • 627
  • 3 437 433
Young Earth Creation: Irrelevant to Salvation?
Belief in a young earth is not required for salvation, yet it is vital to the Gospel.
00:00 Intro
1:23 It's a Gospel issue but not a salvation issue
2:31 What you need to believe to be saved
2:56 What don't you need to fully grasp to be saved
5:36 The Burgess Shale supports Noah's flood
7:40 Salvation and doctrines
9:30 4 connections between the Gospel and the age of the earth
16:46 An old earth destroys the Gospel
19:05 Natural selection is not evolution
20:45 An old earth = death before sin
22:52 Old earth leads people away from Christ
25:16 Noah's flood is the key to understanding the age of the earth
25:48 Summary
Переглядів: 1 488

Відео

Climate Change: Who's to Blame?
Переглядів 809Місяць тому
Is there a climate emergency? Continuing from last week, we examine more failed climate predictions, find the root of the claim that “97 % of scientists” agree that climate change is man-made, and consider the ramifications of a singular focus on fixing the climate without considering other factors. Related articles: A biblical and scientific approach to climate change (creation.com/climate-cha...
A Biblical Approach to Climate Change
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Місяць тому
The worldviews behind different approaches to climate change are introduced. Climate models often fail to predict measured climate data. Continued in Part 2: Related articles: Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) -a biblical and scientific approach to climate change creation.com/climate-change 0:00 Intro 2:07 Reactions to climate change are affected by one's worldview 3:57 Noah's flood and climat...
The impossibility of ape to human evolution
Переглядів 3,6 тис.9 місяців тому
The impossibility of ape to human evolution
Darwin's theory destroyed
Переглядів 1,7 тис.9 місяців тому
Darwin's theory destroyed
Abortion justified in rape cases?
Переглядів 7219 місяців тому
Abortion justified in rape cases?
Evidence against evolution the Miller-Urey experiment
Переглядів 2,6 тис.9 місяців тому
Evidence against evolution the Miller-Urey experiment
The Complexity of Human DNA Destroys Evolution
Переглядів 7 тис.9 місяців тому
The Complexity of Human DNA Destroys Evolution
Abortion to save the mother?
Переглядів 54910 місяців тому
Abortion to save the mother?
Biologists: Human life begins at conception
Переглядів 81810 місяців тому
Biologists: Human life begins at conception
Fetus not fully human yet?
Переглядів 37710 місяців тому
Fetus not fully human yet?
Pro-choice arguments refuted
Переглядів 49910 місяців тому
Pro-choice arguments refuted
Refuting the 'famous violinist' argument for abortion
Переглядів 73811 місяців тому
Refuting the 'famous violinist' argument for abortion
Secular and feminist arguments against abortion
Переглядів 42911 місяців тому
Secular and feminist arguments against abortion
The two-year old abortion test
Переглядів 1,1 тис.11 місяців тому
The two-year old abortion test
CO2 levels and climate change. Don’t panic!
Переглядів 2,6 тис.11 місяців тому
CO2 levels and climate change. Don’t panic!
The Bible describes the pre-born as people
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
The Bible describes the pre-born as people
Abortion: A Matter of Choice?
Переглядів 4,6 тис.Рік тому
Abortion: A Matter of Choice?
What did animals eat after leaving Noah’s Ark?
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Рік тому
What did animals eat after leaving Noah’s Ark?
Four problems with the 99% similar chimp human DNA figure
Переглядів 2 тис.Рік тому
Four problems with the 99% similar chimp human DNA figure
How did fresh and saltwater fish survive Noah’s Flood?
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
How did fresh and saltwater fish survive Noah’s Flood?
Was Noah’s Ark big enough for animals and their food?
Переглядів 1 тис.Рік тому
Was Noah’s Ark big enough for animals and their food?
New research: Chimp Human DNA not 99% similar
Переглядів 3,9 тис.Рік тому
New research: Chimp Human DNA not 99% similar
What was the ‘pitch’ used on Noah’s Ark?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
What was the ‘pitch’ used on Noah’s Ark?
Could Noah’s Ark survive big ocean waves?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
Could Noah’s Ark survive big ocean waves?
No death before sin, but what about plants?
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Рік тому
No death before sin, but what about plants?
‘Species’ vs ‘Kinds’ on Noah’s Ark
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
‘Species’ vs ‘Kinds’ on Noah’s Ark
Genesis Account giveaway
Переглядів 981Рік тому
Genesis Account giveaway
How big was Noah's Ark?
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
How big was Noah's Ark?
Is Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat?
Переглядів 2,9 тис.Рік тому
Is Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat?

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @ShaniaSuperFan
    @ShaniaSuperFan 14 годин тому

    Love your show -- please keep them coming!!

  • @wash99
    @wash99 17 годин тому

    Great flood

  • @christophermunn3819
    @christophermunn3819 20 годин тому

    Darwin, found an answer to this, please try and keep up.

  • @bryanutility9609
    @bryanutility9609 7 днів тому

    Noah’s flood 😂

  • @gzoro8645
    @gzoro8645 7 днів тому

    They also found soft tissue on those fossils that were supposedly millions of years old. Also remains can fossilize as quickly as 10,000 years so does that mean we should carbon date them just because they've turned into "rocks". You're logic is broken.

  • @BiologosDebunked
    @BiologosDebunked 8 днів тому

    Even secular scientists admit it now. Thank you!

  • @BiologosDebunked
    @BiologosDebunked 8 днів тому

    Amen

  • @keiferalford7961
    @keiferalford7961 11 днів тому

    Uhhh....not so fast. First off dating of the footprints have a error of up to 50 million years older than the date claimed..plus...tiktaalik could have been crawling around for millions of years PRIOR to the fossil found...no one is saying that they found the very FIRST tiktaalik...so your argument is not sound.

  • @carter358
    @carter358 11 днів тому

    The Atheist creation storie is the big bang, and the atheist creation story has actual evidence. CMB radiation Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation which is a low level of radiation present EVERYWHERE in the universe. It is the radiation leftover from the big bang. It is essentially an echo of the big bang. That's how big a bang it was! We can still hear the echo. It is quantifiable (meaning you can measure it! I know this science stuff doesn't come easy to many of you theists, so you're welcome!) It is provable. It can be seen through an electron microscope. So there is verified evidence of the atheist creation story the big bang. Where is the evidence of the theist creation story? Please don't say it's that hateful, racist, violent book because anyone can write a book. I find it odd that the first thing most theists do is go to that book considering it was assembled by King James, a confirmed homosexual who referred to his boyfriend as his husband (his letters are still in the British archives)

  • @heruraha93
    @heruraha93 11 днів тому

    Nonsense

  • @TickedOffPriest
    @TickedOffPriest 14 днів тому

    If your evidence does not match the predictions, you get a new hypothesis. Unless of course money is tied to your predictions.

  • @wesleycolemanmusic
    @wesleycolemanmusic 15 днів тому

    Theropods and dinosaurs both independently evolved feathers. Feathers were in neither genome, but then random mutations happened to arrive at the complex and precise genetic material that codes for the adaptation. This all happens before the environment selects for it. If it wasn't a convergent evolution that would mean the modern bird phenotypes existed in the Late Cretaceous. That's a bit of a predicament.

  • @HkMk-er3vy
    @HkMk-er3vy 18 днів тому

    The Arab world is the biggest and the best

  • @Tiger1-ir7yy
    @Tiger1-ir7yy 21 день тому

    Amen 🙏 thank you for your content and God's blessings be upon you

  • @MSA
    @MSA 22 дні тому

    Convergent evolution does not confuse evolutionists, nor it poses any difficulty. Thanks to genetics we can find similarities beyond their looks, that's why we know dolphins and bisons share a common ancestor, unlike dolphins and sharks. Adaptations lead to the body shape of an animal and viceversa. The shape of a shark is hydrodinamycal, and dolphins evolved to be very similar because that's the optimal swimming shape. Better adaptations lead to be the fittest to an environment, if the environment changes and you don't adapt you go extinct

  • @fatalheart7382
    @fatalheart7382 22 дні тому

    “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

  • @callumclarke1733
    @callumclarke1733 22 дні тому

    Atheists believe the scientific impossibility Nothing' created everything 😂

  • @anitasanders728
    @anitasanders728 23 дні тому

    Thank you so much for such a concise informative video. I refer people to it.

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      You are so welcome!

  • @timorean320
    @timorean320 23 дні тому

    God, is immaterial, and timeless. Thats like past, present, future all existing at once.

  • @douglasrasmussen480
    @douglasrasmussen480 25 днів тому

    Suggesting a c4eation day is a different measure is pure unsupported speculation inserted by apologists.

  • @douglasrasmussen480
    @douglasrasmussen480 25 днів тому

    It no more assures an afterlife than any other Christian myth.

  • @vociferonheraldofthewinter2284
    @vociferonheraldofthewinter2284 25 днів тому

    I do believe in God, but C14 is produced naturally in the stratosphere, isn't it? Doesn't it go everywhere?

  • @multifaceteduser3405
    @multifaceteduser3405 25 днів тому

    ricky gervais still thinks its 99%

  • @achildofthelight4725
    @achildofthelight4725 27 днів тому

    And you believe man literally was made from the dust of the earth! All land life came from the same soil... man came from the same roots that rose up out of the darkness into the light in the third period of time.

  • @djsarg7451
    @djsarg7451 28 днів тому

    Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists. Romans 5:12 “Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so death passed to all mankind in turn.” This is clear death came to “all mankind”, not animals. Why would God kill animals due to man’s sin?

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      The word 'day' has about a dozen different meaning both in English and the Hebrew of Genesis. In Genesis 2:4 it is synonymous wit the word 'time'. In Genesis 1:5 it appears twice. "God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day." The first 'day' refers to just the light portion of an earth rotation. The second 'day' refers to a full rotation. It's not hard to determine the word 'day' in Genesis. We did a video on this: ua-cam.com/video/7Wt5wr5OPfA/v-deo.html For more info about the 7th day continuing to today (it does not) please see our article: creation.com/is-the-seventh-day-an-eternal-day

  • @jacob.tudragens
    @jacob.tudragens 28 днів тому

    God was very specific as to how he did it. It takes a great deal of 'faith' to believe that He created the Universe differently than He described the creation in His Word! If your God is not powerful enough to maintain an accurate record of His work, you worship the wrong god! My God created the Universe and everything in it in 6 days. Because He said He did! God is not mocked. Calling Him a liar feels like Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit and should probably be avoided!

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 28 днів тому

      Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists. Romans 5:12 “Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so death passed to all mankind in turn.” This is clear death came to “all mankind”, not animals. Why would God kill animals due to man’s sin?

    • @douglasrasmussen480
      @douglasrasmussen480 25 днів тому

      God is not a liar. The people promoting Christian mythology are the liars.

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Here's how the '6000 year old earth' can be deduced from Scripture: creation.com/6000-years

    • @douglasrasmussen480
      @douglasrasmussen480 3 дні тому

      @@CMIVideo Just more Christian apologist bunk! Geology, Oceanography, speleology, glaciology, chemistry, genetics, astrophysics and a host of other demonstrable studies prove the earth is far, far older than young earth zealots would try to convince others.. Using scripture from a book filled with myriad demonstrable falsehoods, ignorance and contrived stories does not serve as a reliable source of information.

  • @stephenboshoff8316
    @stephenboshoff8316 29 днів тому

    Abortion is murder, and the bible is clear no murderer will enter into heaven

  • @RnRJohnny
    @RnRJohnny 29 днів тому

    In a world of climate zones, what is a global climate? Is there any such thing?

  • @billwebb554
    @billwebb554 29 днів тому

    I have found the gospel to be exactly the same. I was young Earth for 40 years. Now I am old Earth and animal death before the Fall of man doesn't change the gospel in the slightest. You talked about deducing things from scripture. We need to consider that Adam and Eve were not even immortal. They needed the tree of Life. Genesis 3. That is the only reason. Absolutely The only reason they had the option for immortality. Do you believe that animals ate from the tree of life? Animal death before the fall of Man does not change. Sin the fall, the person of Christ and his work life death Resurrection in the slightest

  • @walkitoff117
    @walkitoff117 29 днів тому

    I believe in Creation, Evolution, Old Earth and Apokatastasis.

  • @StringVelocity
    @StringVelocity 29 днів тому

    Wait … your view on Abortion absolutely is a matter of salvation…how can you be a follower of Christ and call yourself a Christian.. YOU CANT

    • @douglasrasmussen480
      @douglasrasmussen480 25 днів тому

      Christianity is a religion based on falsehoods, ignorances, hypocrisy and contrived stories. To claim one is a Christian is to own these facts.

  • @dargostvolos614
    @dargostvolos614 29 днів тому

    easy to prove the age of the world if you believe the bible and use logic.. some think the days could have been a long time using the scripture that says a day to God is like 1000 years and 1000 years is like a day to God.. but that was referring to God being in time.. to him there is no difference .. To him Moses was like yesterday to him.. BUt if the days of Genesis was 1000 years so would be a sabbath rest.. but.. its not

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 28 днів тому

      1000 years is about God, not earth. Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.

    • @dargostvolos614
      @dargostvolos614 28 днів тому

      @@djsarg7451 Hmmm i guess you got it all figured out..hehe

  • @dargostvolos614
    @dargostvolos614 29 днів тому

    Jesus Became a Man.. who was totally dependent on the Father, He was the Son of God but gave up his all powerful all knowing etc to be totally dependent on His Father.. and example for us to follow

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Ooops. Yes, Jesus became human, but he did not give up being God. Otherwise the Trinity would have been destroyed. We cover that in this short video: ua-cam.com/video/bt1ppG5XT9E/v-deo.html and in greater detail here: ua-cam.com/video/r0jjpoTYqjU/v-deo.html Hope that helps.

    • @dargostvolos614
      @dargostvolos614 3 дні тому

      @@CMIVideo um what? You really think thats possible? Jesus Became a Man who was in complete unity with the Father and the Spirit.. what is your definition of being God.. Jesus was not all powerful not all knowing when on earth.. he was completely dependant on the father and the Spirit.. to say what you said for one says ..The Trinity Was together .. He was just in the form of a Man.. It was still the one who was with God and was God.. but he was now Human..

  • @dargostvolos614
    @dargostvolos614 29 днів тому

    The Word Believe is the Problem really.. What it ment back in the days of Jesus is different then what it means in English today. You Believe in God In Hebrew it is more of a securing yourself to Him.. If you do not believe Genesis.. you dont believe in Him because your not Securing yourself to Him.. John 3 16 has been Taken out of context of the whole of the Gospel.. when you Believe in Jesus.. your securing your life to Him.. By Faith.. Which includes Taking up your cross ... Baptism and on.. Nowadays we see Believe as an agreeable opinion

  • @idunno3302
    @idunno3302 29 днів тому

    The undecipherable divine book of its true cause I said so

  • @NathanMillsCoaching
    @NathanMillsCoaching 29 днів тому

    When YEC reach heaven, they'll be old OEC there to greet them ;)

  • @MOTWMB
    @MOTWMB 29 днів тому

    Great video, now go deeper and show support for Biblical flat Earth 🙌🏽

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      That would be tricky since there is no biblical support for a flat earth.

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 29 днів тому

    It keeps people from believing that the Bible is true! So it is most definitely important 🙏🙏🙏✝️🕊️

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 29 днів тому

    Amen CMI 🙂🙏✝️

  • @jameywc2
    @jameywc2 Місяць тому

    Silly stuff

  • @TickedOffPriest
    @TickedOffPriest Місяць тому

    The Bible is sharper than any two-edged sword.

  • @truthisbeautiful7492
    @truthisbeautiful7492 Місяць тому

    Humans are all from Adam and Eve through Noah and his family. Neanderthals were humans!

  • @truthisbeautiful7492
    @truthisbeautiful7492 Місяць тому

    Technically denying the trinity or denying the hypostatic union are salvation issues. I understand you are trying to put some distinctions on confusion vs heretical

    • @commentfreely5443
      @commentfreely5443 Місяць тому

      and not believing the bible while pretending to believe it and changing it to fit the unlikely hypothesis evolution are problems

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Yes, the Trinity and the hypostatic union ARE important doctrines. But can someone be ignorant of those things and still be saved? Yes. Consider the thief on the cross who had no understanding of these things, yet repented and was saved. We get into that a little at this point: ua-cam.com/video/Mt_Q87LxywM/v-deo.html

  • @Chilledbaconstrip
    @Chilledbaconstrip Місяць тому

    Always love the content!!! A question though, I watched a large documentary on coral bleaching. From what I saw it did seem to be extremely drastic and affecting all the coral reefs.

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Those are old programs. Coral reefs today (2024) are doing very well.

  • @IAMhassentyou
    @IAMhassentyou Місяць тому

    Amen 🙏

  • @temjiu9915
    @temjiu9915 Місяць тому

    Is it critical to salvation? No. I have 4 brothers in my LTG group, and I'm the only one supporting a young earth. One other is undecided, he feels God will show him the answer when he comes face to face with him. The others believe in a few different theories, yet all of us have a close relationship with Christ and God, and we all believe in the power of the holy spirit. BUT...when College age students who left their faith are questioned about the reasons why, one of the top reasons every time is the age of the earth. And almost all of them say that when they had questions about this, none of their mentors (pastors, church leaders, parents) had answers for them. Even top leaders in the faith and popular Christian entertainers who leave the faith say the same things. the two top reasons are age of the earth and world suffering. I have never led someone to Christ by arguing the age of the earth, but there is lots of evidence that unanswered questions about the inerrancy of the Bible has led people away from the Gospel, and eventually away from Christ. The inerrancy of the Gospel is critical to our relationship with God, even if it is not necessary for our baseline salvation. God doesn't want us just "saved". He wants us, as Paul states, "To be fully equipped to do all good works." A soldier with only half his gear and half his faith in his superiors isn't even half a soldier.

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Well put. People can believe in an old earth and still be saved. But an old earth is terribly inconsistent with the Gospel.

  • @I_am_Mister_Y
    @I_am_Mister_Y Місяць тому

    Evolution is a fact, and schools are there just to explain and teach facts.

    • @CMIVideo
      @CMIVideo 3 дні тому

      Natural selection, change in allele frequency over time and speciation are facts. Evolution (from molecules to man) are not. Even 'gain of function' mutations do not support evolution. See: ua-cam.com/video/myXaAU_JnqU/v-deo.html

    • @I_am_Mister_Y
      @I_am_Mister_Y 3 дні тому

      @@CMIVideo If evolution isn't a fact, then by what non-evolutionary process do you explain the diversity of modern apes, including us? And that's just apes alone.

    • @I_am_Mister_Y
      @I_am_Mister_Y Годину тому

      @@CMIVideo Of not an evolutionary model of common ancestry (which has been proven and even been directly observed, but for the sake of argument let's ignore that) them what working model with explanatory and predictive power are you using for the observations? Observations such as the diversity of modern apes, incIuding us.

  • @charlestonjames
    @charlestonjames Місяць тому

    Old earth believers have their explanations of how the sin resulting from death is only spiritual death, thinking this rescues their view from your objections. But there is another problem old earthers neglect, which you could include in a follow up video: if there is physical death, predation, and disease before sin, by necessary implication there would also be fear and sadness. To hold that fear and sadness would exist in a world without sin is a non-sequitur. You guys should bring this out in a critique of the old earth view.

    • @davidjanbaz7728
      @davidjanbaz7728 29 днів тому

      There's a difference between in the Garden of Eden and what happened outside the Garden of Eden. They are different locations on the Earth !!! YEC is more destructive to the Gospel. U can't be Saved if you Don't know God as Trinity !!!

    • @mattd398
      @mattd398 28 днів тому

      ​@@anthonyb.2876 If you think these issues are important regarding 'salvation' and the Gospel, then you don't know what the Gospel and 'salvation' is.

    • @mattd398
      @mattd398 28 днів тому

      @anthonyb.2876 Demonstrate how it is important regarding salvation: Yec/Oec, global vs local flood, supposed history of Tanakh, etc.

    • @mattd398
      @mattd398 28 днів тому

      @anthonyb.2876 Where did Jesus speak of Adam? Or is Jesus now St. Paul? What OT? Not only are there different OT canons, there are different dates, and Jews hold different reverence to Tanakh. Torah is different than Nevi'im and Ketuvim. To them, Torah is the word of God. Almost the same thing with the different NT canons in the early christianities. So what exactly is the word of God? Catholic, Ethiopian, protestant, oriental, or the Eastern orthodox canon? Whenever you read the Bible, you are choosing what to believe is literal verses not. You are choosing what to believe the passage means, or are you going to say passage x always means you. And if you don't adhere to that, you are in error when another person says passage x means z? Why do you think there were different Christian sects? Jewish sects? And please tell me, how is this all important regardingsalvation? Regarding the Gospel?

    • @mattd398
      @mattd398 28 днів тому

      @anthonyb.2876 It's nice to know you can't defend your believes. Cool, have a goodbday

  • @noalliances
    @noalliances Місяць тому

    I have never heard or seen anyone call out a professing Christian who holds to an old earth model a heretic. If young earth is relevant, wouldn't YEC be doing just that?

    • @IAMhassentyou
      @IAMhassentyou Місяць тому

      I've never said that about an OEC but I certainly do believe that regarding theistic evolutionists.

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 Місяць тому

      It's relevant, but it doesn't mean you are doomed I'd you are wrong.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 28 днів тому

      You are correct. All YEC leaders teach if you are not with us (YEC), you are an atheist evolutionist. Falsely claiming there are only two world views YEC and atheist evolutionist. (Thus Old Earth creationism is not even real). YEC call Christians atheist evolutionist all the time. YEC leaders are rude. Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.

  • @krbohn101
    @krbohn101 Місяць тому

    Thanks for your work!